[zeromq-dev] [crossroads-dev] [ANNOUNCE] paperjam -- device implementation for zeromq and crossroads

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Wed Apr 18 23:41:10 CEST 2012

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Paul Colomiets <paul at colomiets.name> wrote:

> IIRC you argued that we need to keep device type in ZDCF,
> didn't you?

Yes, because it's a shortcut to pre-built device models, in other
words lets you abstract the choice of sockets.

But it's pretty moot; defining the socket types explicitly is just the same.

In ZDCF and the generic device we implemented socket options afair.

If anyone actually wants this, I'll make it all work again.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list