[zeromq-dev] drop oldest

[Pieter Hintjens]

It's an old discussion; dropping the oldest message for PUB-SUB would
be more logical than dropping the newest, but it was always considered
too hard to do. If you want to try it, and send a patch, people would
appreciate that IMO.

-Pieter

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Sergey Hripchenko
<shripchenko at intermedia.net> wrote:
> I don’t think so, but I do arguing for that option too.
>
> Specially for PUB->bind() and multiple SUB->connect() scenarios.
>
>
>
> From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
> [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Krikun
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:25 AM
> To: zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> Subject: [zeromq-dev] drop oldest
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Is there a policy to drop an oldest packet first (with the high-watermark
> option)? In particular, it is oftentimes desired, only to save the most
> recent message received.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Daniel Krikun
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed and
> may contain Intermedia.net Inc privileged, confidential and/or proprietary
> information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
> computer. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action
> concerning the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone
> other than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>