[zeromq-dev] using 4.0?

Ian Barber ian.barber at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 16:46:58 CEST 2011

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> I would propose focusing on 2.1 and 3.0 version and discontinuing
> official 4.0 project. If I would want to get my code to the trunk I
> would have to do it in the same way as any other contributor, ie.
> propose a cleanly applicable patch to 3.0, discuss it thouroughly with
> the community, etc.

To be honest, I think the issue is purely perception and maturity. In other
projects big hairy changes can be done, discarded, and done again in the
development trunk without effecting what's actually coming out. I think
Pieter's point about not pushing people towards the github is a major part
of this, and it may also be something as simple as having a separate mailing
list for ZeroMQ experimental stuff, and another for actual users hitting
problems with released zeromq.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110928/c2be3b3b/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list