[zeromq-dev] using 4.0?

Dirkjan Ochtman dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Mon Sep 26 12:34:11 CEST 2011


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:27, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> Everything else should be considered to be random experimentation and
> not promoted as a core product under 0MQ brand.
>
> Of course, experimental branches can be used as sources of patches for
> the mainline product.
>
> Thoughts?

Sounds good. I suggest you just don't use version numbers for anything
experimental. E.g. label 4.x as some-goal-you-have-for-4 instead of
4.x.

Cheers,

Dirkjan



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list