[zeromq-dev] Multithreaded server, delivers message in one direction

[tlrx]

Hi Chuck,

I was using 3.0 version for testing. I changed back to 2.1, recompiled
everything (without using Maven for the jzmq java binding) and everything is
OK now.

Thanks again for your help.

-- Tanguy

Le 25 octobre 2011 17:51, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist at mac.com> a écrit :

>
> On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:44 AM, tlrx wrote:
>
> Thanks again Chuck.
>
> The REP is a mistake, it was ZMQ.XREP but i desparetly tried with something
> else (REP for this copy/paste).
>
> I checked the Java examples again but there is no example that follows a
> XREQ ROUTER DEALER QUEUE XREP pattern.
>
> In the Java example, sometimes a empty string is send (
> https://github.com/imatix/zguide/blob/master/examples/Java/lruqueue.java)
>  sometimes no null/empty string is sent at all (
> https://github.com/imatix/zguide/blob/master/examples/Java/rtdealer.java).
> In the REP example, sometimes the last byte of the message is set to zero.
>
> I tried the previous code with XREP and replying an empty string, but the
> problem is still here. I'm definitely missing something...
>
>
> Well, it's tough to help you with your code when you paste the "wrong"
> thing and say it doesn't work.
>
> If you haven't read the guide yet, please do so. There is a chapter on
> customer request/reply routing using ROUTER/DEALER sockets. There was a Java
> code example attached to part of it that you can read here:
>
> http://zguide.zeromq.org/java:rtdealer
>
> This is the same code example you posted above. If it isn't working, then
> please tell us what kind of error it is producing or what behavior you see.
> If it *is* working, then please explain what part of it confuses you.
>
> At this point, I'm curious to know if you are using 2.1.10 for testing or
> if you are using 3.03 for testing. In 3.x, the API changed such that
> XREQ/XREP are no longer synonyms for DEALER/ROUTER, so connecting the two of
> them may or may not work since the routing envelopes are handled a bit
> differently. There was a recent thread started on this topic (within the
> last week).
>
> cr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20111028/cdb4b6d9/attachment.htm>