[zeromq-dev] 3.x zmq_msg_t change proposal

[Pieter Hintjens]

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist at mac.com> wrote:

> And looking at ZMQ_RCVMORE and how it is used, I'm not convinced this should be a property of the socket either.

Indeed. This was one of my change proposals for 3.x. It's how CZMQ
does it on zframe.

> I looked back through all of the message threads from the past 1+ years where RCVMORE was discussed (it was introduced around April 2010). I could not see any reason given for why it had to be a socket property.

It was historically meant to simplify the API afair.

Your proposal is great, yes.

-Pieter