[zeromq-dev] Adding workers dynamically ...
Ian Barber
ian.barber at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 17:55:30 CEST 2011
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Seref Arikan
<serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote:
> Apologies for being lazy and asking this in response to your mail; but I
> remember reading about a lazy joiners syndrome, where the later workers
> arriving later do not get a fair share of the work.
> Is this still an issue? Is paranoid pirate a solution to this problem?
>
> Kind regards
> Seref
That's somewhat dependent on the size of queues - without an HWM, an
early connector could end up accepting a whole bunch of messages and
queuing them locally.
Ian
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list