[zeromq-dev] Adding workers dynamically ...

[Seref Arikan]

Apologies for being lazy and asking this in response to your mail; but I
remember reading about a lazy joiners syndrome, where the later workers
arriving later do not get a fair share of the work.
Is this still an issue? Is paranoid pirate a solution to this problem?

Kind regards
Seref


On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Lucas Hope <lucas.r.hope at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've had such a system running on the paranoid pirate model from the guide
> for some time. It works very well for my use case.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, James Ladd <james.ladd at playup.com> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to add workers at runtime without re-starting clients or
>> brokers?
>> ie: a box fails and we bring another online with 'n' workers on it.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Dr Lucas Hope - lucas.r.hope at skype
> Machine Learning and Software Engineering Consultant
> Melbourne, Australia
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20111011/95e41c5e/attachment.htm>