[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Improved response to socket violations

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Fri May 20 18:09:56 CEST 2011

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> The problem is that using single socket from mutliple threads can cause
> basically any error, whether assertion, segfault or whatever. Singling
> this one out doesn't make much sense. Moreover, as Mato points out, the
> assertion can happen because of limited OS resources, in which case the
> message would be misleading.

So the repeated instances of this particular assertion failure are
just coincidence?

Fair enough, but it reflects badly on 0MQ that it can't more
accurately detect and report such a common application error.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list