[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Section about thread-safeness in zmq(7) simplified

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Fri May 20 14:55:07 CEST 2011

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Martin Lucina <mato at kotelna.sk> wrote:

> OK, thanks for the explanation.

NP. There was another incident (Mike Pearce's "Assertion failed:
nbytes == sizeof (command_t) (mailbox.cpp:246) during orderly

I'd forward you his email where he says it's due to using sockets in
two threads, and how the zmq man page mislead him, but since it was a
private email I can't. :-/

Folk, please do _not_ randomly discuss 0MQ issues off-list. It's
disturbing to miss half the conversation. The only time for off-list
discussions is when company confidential info is involved. Reply-All
is your friend.

(I suspect it's Sustrik's email client, that is setting the Reply-To
address to him alone, causing this.)


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list