[zeromq-dev] ZMTP/1.1 - proposal

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Tue May 17 22:35:06 CEST 2011

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

>> In terms of backwards compatibility, it seems the best we can do is
>> add a version header to the protocol, and check this in 2.1 and later
>> branches.
> That would break backward compatibility in 2.1 series.

No, it would not. Please read again, repeat until it's clear. :-)

> Yes for 3.0. 2.2 is up to you.

2.2 is up to demand, if there's no-one who wants that space (mix of
stable and experimental), I'm willing to drop it in favor of 3.0.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list