[zeromq-dev] ZMTP/1.1 - proposal
ph at imatix.com
Mon May 16 17:22:35 CEST 2011
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote:
> Strictly taken it seems like adding a version header check would go
> against the bugfix-only rule for 2.1 inclusion (changing the wire
> protocol and semantics).
Yes, we don't want new protocol support or semantics in 2.1, it's
dangerous and not needed. But I'd like to make 2.1 apps resistant
(i.e. not crash) when hit with modified ZMTP protocols.
More information about the zeromq-dev