[zeromq-dev] Tips on optimization of TCP for Windows 7 and Windows server
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Sun May 15 20:26:11 CEST 2011
Christian,
A random idea: could you retest performance using the old 2.0.11
package? On the remote chance that something changed in the 2.1 branch
that affects Windows performance...
Cheers
Pieter
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Christian Martinez
<chmar at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks Steve! Good to know the docs reflect your experience.
>
>
>
> --CM
>
>
>
> From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
> [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Steven McCoy
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 1:24 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Tips on optimization of TCP for Windows 7 and
> Windows server
>
>
>
> On 14 May 2011 01:03, Christian Martinez <chmar at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Yes I could look this up internally, but I’d like input from the list on
> what settings/tweaks they’ve used in real life that had the most impact on
> their performance.
>
>
>
>
>
> Follow the performance guidelines set by Microsoft, the 2008 R2 guide works
> pretty well.
>
>
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463392
>
>
>
> I'd love it if you can find the source code for NTttcp as yields rather odd
> results at times when compared with the original Test TCP (TTCP), PCAUSA
> port PCATTCP, iperf or netperf. Here's my notes for UDP and PGM performance
> testing,
>
>
>
> http://openpgmdev.blogspot.com/2011/04/wherefore-art-thou-ip-packet-make-haste.html
>
>
>
> --
> Steve-o
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list