[zeromq-dev] Subports

[Andrew Hume]

haha!
i have to work with a group whose designed solution was to keep 16000
ports open all the time (actually, they close and open all the time,
trampling all over the 32K-64k address space).
what a pain in the arse!

On May 3, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> 
> If the only reason for subports is to "use fewer TCP ports on this
> system", that seems pointless and IMO if people are opening thousands
> of ports, it's a design fault.
> 
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


------------------
Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845
andrew at research.att.com  (Work) +1 973-236-2014
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110503/67c9ac64/attachment.htm>