[zeromq-dev] Important: backward incompatible changes for 0MQ/3.0!
m.pales at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 08:44:59 CET 2011
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> 7. We should then find out whether it's possible to overload standard
> malloc/free in the library in such a way that our implementation is used
> instead of the implementation provided by C runtime.
On Solaris, I usually link my application with libumem due to its better
scalability and mainly debugging capabilities. That way all
calls are replaced by libumem's implementation.
This approach also works for tcmalloc, jemalloc, mtmalloc, etc.
Using LD_PRELOAD mechanism is also possible but IMHO it is mainly for
development to try and see or tests like this:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the zeromq-dev