[zeromq-dev] Contribution process, revisited

Martin Lucina mato at kotelna.sk
Tue Mar 22 23:41:23 CET 2011


ph at imatix.com said:
> Anyhow, I'm not interested in debating this. It's been the best part
> of a year, and after writing a *lot* of very different patterns, and
> after careful discussion with folk here, it's amazingly satisfying to
> do my very best to remove those names from the user lexicon. They will
> be mentioned in the Guide as a small footnote, and removed from every
> single piece of code I'm responsible for.

Incidentally, I like what you want to do with the high-level zapi you
announced. I really do.

Why can't we get along, you build all the fancy ROUTERs and funky
abstractions you want in zapi, and the core can support that.

That way, we wouldn't have to have these arguments at all.

-mato



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list