[zeromq-dev] Poll about linger and termination behaviour!

Chuck Remes cremes.devlist at mac.com
Sat Mar 12 16:18:27 CET 2011


On Mar 12, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Unfortunately, there was backward incompatible change introduced with 
> 0MQ/2.1.0
> 
> Namely, there was "linger" functionality introduced which allows a 0MQ 
> sockeThere is no obvious solution for the problem. Rather, the intent is to 
> cause as little pain as possible. Thus, please, let us know which 
> behaviour is preferable for you. Vote for either "infinite" default or 
> zero default. The solution that gets more votes will make it into next 
> version of 2.1

In my local copies I already patch them to default to 0 LINGER. So, I vote for 0.

cr




More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list