[zeromq-dev] Is recoverable swapping a possibility in the future?

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Tue Mar 1 18:38:19 CET 2011

On 03/01/2011 06:34 PM, Ian Barber wrote:

> I think that this ties into the discussion of making SWAP a device
> anyway - in my mind this kind of persistance and recovery should be
> pluggable, and it really should be implemented as some sort of
> persistence device. If there can be hooks in the library to making
> building this kind of thing easier then that would be great - not sure
> what they would be though!

I was talking about explicit identities. Sorry for being unclear.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list