[zeromq-dev] Thinking out loud ...

Andrew Hume andrew at research.att.com
Thu Jun 30 11:27:09 CEST 2011

i don't understand what this sort of specification is meant to accomplish.

it seems to be a description of a processing flow for a rudimentary job scheduling system.
but its not complete enough for anyone to use nor implement.
its hard to discern what is 0mq related, and what is  job scheduler related.

and is the style to talk about such things on the list or on the web page?


On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Artur Brugeman wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 05:57 AM, Artur Brugeman wrote:
> It's based on XREP sockets now. I've given quite a lot thinking to it,
> and can share my experience.
> Please, do so.
> Martin
> As the letter grew, I've decided to post it somewhere, and give you the link. The best place I've found on zeromq website was at rfc.zeromq.org, so here it is - http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:14
> "Worker-Manager Protocol is a generalization of request-reply pattern, allowing many workers talk to many managers (servers) with intermediate devices and custom load-balancing".
> Will be happy to hear your comments.
> Artur Brugeman.
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845
andrew at research.att.com  (Work) +1 973-236-2014
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110630/cbcd60fa/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list