[zeromq-dev] Windows 7 performance comparisons

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Fri Jun 24 11:30:27 CEST 2011


The question is whether is whether adjusting 0MQ to use this library is 
in any way simpler that adjusting it to use IOCP proper.

Martin

On 06/24/2011 11:28 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Looks very useful, and the license is BSD as far as I can see, so fine
> for use with libzmq.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On 24 Jun 2011 10:37, "Dhammika Pathirana" <dhammika at gmail.com
> <mailto:dhammika at gmail.com>> wrote:
>  > Hi Martin,
>  >
>  > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com
> <mailto:sustrik at 250bpm.com>> wrote:
>  >> On 06/22/2011 11:07 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
>  >>> Following on from within a VM, here is native Windows results.
>  >>
>  >> Pretty bad.
>  >>
>  >> Nobody ever done much optimisation on Win platform :|
>  >>
>  >> Btw, I recall there's the poll function in Win7. What about trying with
>  >> ZMQ_FORCE_POLL defined so that it's used instead of select?
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  > We could try libuv from node guys.
>  > github.com/joyent/libuv <http://github.com/joyent/libuv>
>  > But we'd have to check their license, I don't think it's GPL friendly.
>  >
>  >
>  > Dhammika
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > zeromq-dev mailing list
>  > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org <mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
>  > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>  >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev




More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list