[zeromq-dev] Windows 7 vs. Linux same hardware

[Steven McCoy]

Still with same overly bogus values forcing 0MQ churn rather than network
performance, this time a quad-core i3, so as we know Windows is slower but
not tragically so,

*Windows (MSVC 2010)*:

$ ./inproc_lat.exe 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
roundtrip count: 100000
average latency: 22.893 [us]

$ ./remote_lat tcp://10.203.9.200:5555 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
roundtrip count: 100000
average latency: 87.487 [us]

$ ./local_thr tcp://*:5555 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
message count: 100000
mean throughput: 3386616 [msg/s]
mean throughput: 27.093 [Mb/s]

*Linux (GCC 4.5)*:

$ ./inproc_lat 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
roundtrip count: 100000
average latency: 16.775 [us]

$ ./remote_lat tcp://10.203.9.200:5555 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
roundtrip count: 100000
average latency: 68.674 [us]

$ ./local_thr tcp://*:5555 1 100000
message size: 1 [B]
message count: 100000
mean throughput: 7704415 [msg/s]
mean throughput: 61.635 [Mb/s]

-- 
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110622/41f3ef4a/attachment.htm>