[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Remove Windows NT 3.5 support from zeromq2-1

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Thu Jun 16 18:29:28 CEST 2011


On 16 June 2011 12:14, Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:

> I really would like to find Microsoft's official verdict on _WINSOCKAPI_ and
> hence the preferred mechanism for handling *winsock2.h*.  Currently there
> is the hack from Microsoft listed previously which is incompatible with *
> mingw-w64* as that raises an assertion saying you must manually include
> first.
>
>
Ok, the choices as enumerated here: http://stronglib.blogspot.com/

*#1  Include winsock2.h before windows.h*

#include <winsock2.h>
#include <windows.h>

Works fine as expected but you cannot catch the Windows version if you
wanted to target NT 3.5.

*#2 Use WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN which bypasses WinSock in windows.h*

#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
#include <windows.h>
#include <winsock2.h>

Works great.

*#3 Use _WINSOCKAPI_ before windows.h*

#define _WINSOCKAPI_
#include <windows.h>
#include <winsock2.h>

Only appears a valid solution for MSVC and bails out on MinGW-w64:

/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/winsock2.h:15:2: warning:
#warning Please include winsock2.h before windows.h


So it looks like #2 is the way to go but I don't have NT 3.5 to verify apart
from matching the existing code.  I guess one can test by forcing the WINVER
globally and see if the headers won't bail out.

-- 
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110616/60fa84a5/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list