[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] resolve "function declaration isn't a prototype" warnings

[MinRK]

No problem.  Patch now uses my full name.

Thanks!
-Min Ragan-Kelley


On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 23:17, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> Min,
>
> Oops. Sorry. I've missed the patch :(
>
> Can you please your real name to sign the patch? It's needed for tracking
> the origin of the changes. I'll also add your name to AUTHORS file.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 01/06/2011 12:52 AM, MinRK wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just thought I would check in, as I haven't seen any activity on this.
>>  Has this patch been rejected or did I just do it wrong?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -MinRK
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 13:46, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com
>> <mailto:benjaminrk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hello,
>>
>>    Tiny patch changes two declarations in headers to form f(void);
>>    instead of f();
>>    which eliminates the "function declaration isn't a
>>    prototype" warnings when compiling against zeromq
>>
>>    -MinRK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110105/6519eb1d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-resolve-function-declaration-isn-t-a-prototype.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1757 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110105/6519eb1d/attachment.obj>