[zeromq-dev] durable subscirbers and inproc

mkogan at semanticresearch.com mkogan at semanticresearch.com
Sat Feb 19 22:45:54 CET 2011


I am currently keeping some zmq sub sockets open on behalf of clients that have unexpectedly disconnected (web socket closed). I was thinking of making use of named sub socket instead. However, I am not sure if I could know if I missed messages.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Michael Kogan
> <mkogan at semanticresearch.com> wrote:
> 
>> If I am using pub/sub with durable subscribers with inproc, is the subscribe semi-durable or actually durable.
> 
> It makes no difference what transport you use, durable sockets have
> the lifespan of the attached peer (the publisher in this case).
> 
>> Are there possibilities for loss with durable subscribers in inproc?
> 
> Not usually. You can lose messages if you overflow your HWM, for
> example. Do you have a specific scenario in mind?
> 
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list