[zeromq-dev] 2.1.8?

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Mon Aug 29 17:04:58 CEST 2011

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote:

> That seems fine with me. Perhaps it would be useful to publish actual
> RC's for a few days before an actual release? E.g. something called
> 2.1.9-rc1, leave it out there for two or three days, then publish
> 2.1.9. Perhaps that would draw just the right amount of testing out of
> the woodwork that you won't have to unpublish actual releases.

Perhaps. I don't like two releases with the same version number; the
patch level (e.g. 9) indicates change. So even one bug fix means a new
patch level.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list