[zeromq-dev] 2.1.8?

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:53, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> It seems tagging the release as 'rc' annoyed several people, so next
> time we'll just delete such cases and skip to the next release number.
> That leaves gaps but is less surprising.

That seems fine with me. Perhaps it would be useful to publish actual
RC's for a few days before an actual release? E.g. something called
2.1.9-rc1, leave it out there for two or three days, then publish
2.1.9. Perhaps that would draw just the right amount of testing out of
the woodwork that you won't have to unpublish actual releases.

Cheers,

Dirkjan