[zeromq-dev] 2.1.8?

Dirkjan Ochtman dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Mon Aug 29 13:27:34 CEST 2011

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:27, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> The idea is to always use unique release numbers, and tag them to
> indicate their maturity.

I might be alone in this, but I've found the treatment of 2.1.8-rc1
pretty confusing. E.g. in my expectations any rc is always followed by
an actual release of the same version numbers. If you want to uniquely
version releases, that's nice too, but then it would be more sensible
(to me) to unpublish the release candidate from e.g. the downloads



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list