[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] IPv6 changes to 4.0

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Fri Aug 26 11:35:07 CEST 2011

On 26 August 2011 15:19, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> On 08/26/2011 09:12 AM, Steven McCoy wrote:
>  http://serverfault.com/**questions/305169/are-multiple-**
>> global-scope-ipv6-addresses-**on-one-adapter-sane/305176#**305176<http://serverfault.com/questions/305169/are-multiple-global-scope-ipv6-addresses-on-one-adapter-sane/305176#305176>
> Maybe the question about resolving an interface name where there are two
> addresses with the same scope should be rather asked on appropriate IETF
> mailing list.
> Martin

I added a new question, this time to stackoverflow for identifying the
source address.


During writing the question I came up with some additional RFCs pointing out
flaws in RFC 3484 sorting and possible solutions.  None of the solutions are
remotely timely and are extremely unlikely to be applied to present or past

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110826/14cb4f33/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list