[zeromq-dev] Renaming ZMQ_RECONNECT_IVL_MAX in 3.0

[Martin Sustrik]

On 04/12/2011 04:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> Hmm, industry practice is short option names ("SNDBUF"), so
> ZMQ_RECONNECT and ZMQ_RECONNECT_MAX would work better.

As the option is not part of POSIX, I have no opinion on this matter.

What do others think? Is shortening the option names worth of it? There 
are couple of other long names out there, e.g. ZMQ_RECOVERY_IVL. Or even 
ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE and ZMQ_UNSUBSCRIBE...

Martin