[zeromq-dev] Moving to 0MQ/3.0, yes or no?

[Antoine Boegli]

IMHO, if the changes are previously documented and discussed this
should be okay with everybody. I really don't like to be surprised
with API change or tool/function removal (zmq_device in my case) when
there is no clear answer to "what can I use instead and how?"



2011/4/10 Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> In the recent month, the discussion about 0MQ/3.0 have shown that the
> radical "parting with the past design flaws" goal of the endeavour
> cannot be achieved. Every tweak has its user that will be hurt if its
> removed. That makes the 3.0 version more or less useless: The flaws
> won't be fixed while at the same time the backward incompatible changes
> will hurt everybody.
>
> Thus, we should revert the 3.0-related changes on master and go further
> with 2.x version, in a fully backward compatible way.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>



-- 
Antoine Boegli
software engineer & linux expert