[zeromq-dev] 0MQ 3.0 - API improvements

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Fri Apr 8 10:36:50 CEST 2011


On 04/08/2011 09:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> Is there any specific reason for not wanting to use proper types for
> these? The use of void * seems to go against all best practice in C.
> I'm not sure it makes sense in C++ either.

POSIX compatibility. Run-time checking (ENOTSOCK) instead of 
compile-time checking.

Martin



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list