[zeromq-dev] zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 34, Issue 124

Thijs Terlouw thijsterlouw at gmail.com
Wed Oct 27 04:26:53 CEST 2010

> From: "Kelly Brock" <Kerby at inocode.com>
> To: "'ZeroMQ development list'" <zeromq-dev at mail.imatix.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:38:15 -0500
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ vs TCP sockets - survey
> Positive points ZMQ (ease of use, fast, threading model, flexible)


> Negative points ZMQ (point 1 connect/disconnect especially. Point 2+3 are less of an issue)

+1 for connect/disconnect! We are working on a very similar scenario.
We don't use ZeroConf, but our own discovery mechanism, but besides
that almost everything Kelly described is what we want to do, and we
too have run into the same issues that Kelly mentioned.

Transacted messages are no issue for us currently, but might be nice
to have. I never looked much in the reactor pattern, so I don't know
what I'm missing there and as such, not an issue for us :)

Thijs Terlouw,
Shenzhen, China

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list