[zeromq-dev] just checking

[Andrew Hume]

thanks.
i am still reluctant to add yet another set of in/out to every
packet being processed, but i guess thats the feng shui of this.
(my input side is O(100B) messages/day.)
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Hume  
> <andrew at research.att.com> wrote:
>
>> using tcp transport, is it still the case that every subscriber  
>> needs to
>> know the tcp port number for every publisher?
>
> In general, you will use a forwarder device to concentrate data from
> publishers and fan it out to subscribers.  N-to-N topologies do not
> scale well.  If you have high data rates you can use multicast (which
> plays the role of a forwarder device).
>
> -
> Pieter Hintjens
> iMatix - www.imatix.com
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

------------------
Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845
andrew at research.att.com  (Work) +1 none currently
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20101022/3571808e/attachment.htm>