[zeromq-dev] Issue 85 & 92

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Sun Oct 3 08:43:04 CEST 2010

On 3 October 2010 13:09, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> Are you proposing that zmq_close blocks until all messages are sent?
I would suggest a parameter, one at least for control of flush or immediate
termination, possibly a second for timeout if that is appropriate.  Give the
control to the application.

Probably would be more prudent to be flush if and only if currently
connected.  Nobody prefers waiting around for an application to shutdown.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20101003/bbab5a20/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list