[zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

[Peter Alexander]

Daniel btw,

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Peter Alexander <vel.accel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel. I spoke to gentoo devs about how bindings should be
> packaged awhile ago... should it be one zeromq package with use flags
> for the bindings _or_ separate packages for each binding. They said
> they prefer separate packages for each binding.
>
> ~Peter
>
> 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka at gmail.com>:
>> I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds
>> (e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball (not as a source from
>> github).
>>

I don't see why you would have to have tarballs... just use the git
eclass... no?

~Peter


>> btw. There is some pgm compilation problem with icc compiler.
>>
>> regards,
>> daniel
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/2 Peter Alexander <vel.accel at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Pieter. Yes worked fine. I edited the page very basicly for now,
>>> which I'll touch up later. Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>>> > Peter,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for pointing out the broken distro category.  I've taken the
>>> > opportunity to change all the wiki categories and make them easier to
>>> > work with.  I've also improved the left nav menu, which was getting
>>> > very cluttered.  You will find the new distro category under the
>>> > 'wiki' menu option now.
>>> >
>>> > Can you take a second to review the new menu and confirm that you can
>>> > edit the Gentoo page?  You will need to login to the Wikidot platform.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Pieter
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Peter Alexander <vel.accel at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Hi all. I've noticed that zeromq-2.0.9 has been included recently in
>>> >> the Gentoo Linux package tree, and I just now submitted an ebuild to
>>> >> them for git master (available at [1]).
>>> >>
>>> >> I've noticed that there is no "distro" page on the wiki as of yet. Is
>>> >> something you'd like to pronounce or maybe not necessarily? There is
>>> >> an empty ~/distro:gentoo [2] page that Martin created a while back
>>> >> but, is un-editable by me and I figure you might want to have a
>>> >> "distro" page for all available distro packages rather than a "distro"
>>> >> category with a page for each.
>>> >>
>>> >> Peter
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339416
>>> >> [2] http://www.zeromq.org/distro:gentoo
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -
>>> > Pieter Hintjens
>>> > iMatix - www.imatix.com
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>