[zeromq-dev] Issue 85 & 92

[Martin Sustrik]

Guys,

>> Your call, Martin.  I'm pretty sure the new behavior of zmq_term will
>> trip up a lot of people.
>
> It did me. When the basic hello world example failed I assumed
> 2.1.0 wasn't ready to even look at and went back to 2.0.9.

As I said: If you have a better idea, please, do propose it.

Complaining about behaviour without proposing a better solution isn't 
going to help.

Martin