[zeromq-dev] Issue 85 & 92
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Fri Oct 1 19:13:50 CEST 2010
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
>> You closed issue 85 I think, but it's not resolved, and I'm reopening it.
>
> If you want it changed you have to think of better semantics.
What is wrong with these semantics:
* If there is work still pending, do it
* Then mark the context as closed
* And return
Which will in the case when there is no work waiting, return
immediately as in 2.0.x, whether or not the socket was properly
closed.
?
-Pieter
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list