[zeromq-dev] Regarding java binding of 0MQ.

gonzalo diethelm gdiethelm at dcv.cl
Wed Nov 24 18:33:11 CET 2010

Are you willing to provide a patch for these (valid) issues?



Gonzalo Diethelm 



From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
[mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Scott Asher
Sent: Wednesday, 24 November, 2010 14:30
To: zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Regarding java binding of 0MQ.


You should just break backwards compatibility.  The binding should match
the C/C++ behavior.


BTW, I DID complain about the constants being made private and moved to
Poller, but no one listened and it wasn't a big deal.


Also, another couple of issues while we're on the Java bindings:


1) (minor) The send/receive flags (e.g. ZMQ.NOBLOCK) are defined as
ints, but the functions expect longs.  

2) (more annoying) Because the Poller class makes all of its underlying
data structures (e.g. the Socket array) private, the only way to even
CHANGE what events a socket is listening for is to recreate the Poller
object and add sockets to it again.  It would be nice to either expose
the underlying structures so we can manipulate stuff ourselves or write
a set of functions (e.g. deregister or an overloaded version of register
which reregisters) that do everything for us.


3) (related to 2) You can register a socket twice because your register
functions have no existence check.  I don't know what the behavior is
here (haven't tested it).  On the Java side I basically have to do a lot
of recreating pollers that I don't have to do on the C++ side.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20101124/0ef4a836/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list