[zeromq-dev] Getting rid of low watermark

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Fri May 28 11:35:27 CEST 2010

Martin Lucina wrote:
> ellisonbg at gmail.com said:
>> Martin,
>> +1
>> When I have used the HWM, I had this thought exactly "how on earth do
>> I pick the LWM?"  I like your idea - even if the exact algorithm you
>> use in picking LWM isn't quite optimal, it can be changed in the
>> future without changing the API.  Great idea.
> +1 from me also, although looking at the emails from at least one person
> saying LWM going away would be a problem for applications, would it make
> sense to have the LWM set by default automatically, but allow overriding it
> manually if someone wishes to do so?

This boils down to the question of API freeze. Should we do it now? 
Should we do it later? It's a pretty sensitive issue.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list