[zeromq-dev] Explicit patterns

[Pieter Hintjens]

Yes, using a verb for devices is neat and gives us a fully consistent model
without becoming verbose.

-Pieter

On May 25, 2010 1:28 AM, "Mark V" <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing a ...
Thanks for making all this effort to keep 0MQ's barriers to entry low.
I did think appending _S,_D to indicate socket, device.  However, it
does clutter the names a little.
Alternatively, you could indicate the socket names are nouns and
device names are verbs (broadly).  This would suggest that the device
ZMQ_BF_STREAMER be named ZMQ_BF_STREAM

Not sure if sockets/devices can be characterized/categorized that way?

HTH
Mark


> Incidental change proposals are to rename parallelized process as
> "butterfly" and pair as "excl...
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100525/d8d9f794/attachment.htm>