[zeromq-dev] UDP vs. EPGM
Pieter Hintjens
pieterh at gmail.com
Wed Mar 3 14:50:45 CET 2010
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> It should be explained in more detail: The reason is that "udp" seems to
> immediately imply "unicast unreliable transfer" which current "udp" is
> definitely not. Quite the opposite: It's multicast and it's reliable.
>
> The proposition is to rename "udp" to "epgm" which stands for
> "encapuslated PGM".
"udp" is certainly misleading but "epgm" adds a concept,
"encapsulation" which needs learning / explaining.
Why not just "pgm"?
-Pieter
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list