[zeromq-dev] Comparing OpenDDS and ZeroMQ Usage and Performance

Peter Alexander vel.accel at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 10:25:21 CEST 2010

Hi Martin,

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> This regression results from removing some kernel-bypass functionality
> (namely lock-free polling) in exchange for more functionality (namely
> allowing for more than 63 threads to use 0MQ sockets).

Just out of curiosity, If a regression is involved for an off hand use
case (more than 63 threads), why not have this as an optional
configuration flag prior to compiling.

But, I'm glad to hear that Linux kernels make this concern negligible.

thanks.. ~Peter

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list