[zeromq-dev] Stable releases

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Mon Jun 7 15:39:14 CEST 2010

Chuck Remes wrote:

>> Ok, anyone any complaints about this solution? If not so, let's go
>> for it.
> I'm not sure what solution you are agreeing to here.
> 1. Renaming your profile to zeromq.

Yes. I meant this one.

> 2. Using branches in your repository rather than forking another one.
Sure. Makes sense. Obviously, there's no way to prevent people from
forking. There are some ~20 forks as for now. That's what distributed
source control is for in the end.

> 3. Using patch releases for bug fixes, minor releases for api
> breakage, major releases for significant library changes.

Dunno. People familiar with the build system should decide.

> 4. ???
> Also, Martin L. and I are the only ones to speak up so far. This
> topic has existed for barely 24 hours. I recommend we leave it for
> another 24-48 hours to get more input from other community members.
> I'm sure there are some good ideas out there that we haven't heard
> yet.



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list