[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"
Oliver Smith
oliver at kfs.org
Tue Jul 27 16:42:03 CEST 2010
On 7/27/2010 9:20 AM, Ben Kloosterman wrote:
> I find "socket" quite confusing , all my work is inproc or via IPC an no
> where am I using TCP sockets..
>
>
> I still think PROD ( Producer) and CON ( Consumer) are very clear PartA
> produces and PartyB consumes , in and out are always relative to who you are
> talking about A out is Bs in
>
True, but that doesn't break the naming convention for exactly that
reason :)
Still - producer and consumer are well suited to the parallelism domain.
+1
- Oliver
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list