[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"

Oliver Smith oliver at kfs.org
Tue Jul 27 15:54:24 CEST 2010


On 7/27/2010 8:23 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
>> ZMQ_PIPELINE_OUT
>> ZMQ_PIPELINE_IN
>>      
> Nice, but a bit long IMO -- at least compared to REQ/REP/PUB/SUB.
>
> What about: PLIN, PLOUT (compare to stdin, stdout) ?
>    
"7" and "8" are shorter too ;-P Hehehehe :)

These are disambiguating, documentary, declarative names. I'm not in 
least proposing that we get rid of the current aliases.

I imagine the man page saying 
"ZMQ_PIPELINE_SOCKET_FOR_OUTGOING_MESSAGES_ONLY_NOT_INCOMING_ONLY_OUTGOING_OK_GOT_THAT_QUESTION_MARK 
(ZMQ_POUT for short)"

(The key part being the ZMQ_POUT for short, not the ridiculous 
non-starter long name I just used :)

- Oliver




More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list