[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"
oliver at kfs.org
Tue Jul 27 15:25:02 CEST 2010
On 7/27/2010 6:20 AM, Matt Weinstein wrote:
> Yeah, you're right, it's too early in the morning here.
> So, is this really ZMQ_INPiPE and ZMQ_OUTPIPE?
> (Or for those in more liberal countries -- ZMQ_PIPE_INHALE and
> ZMQ_PIPE_EXHALE? :-) )
As I mentioned before - that contraction has the disadvantage of
sounding like it only supports named pipes :) (ZMQ_BONG_INHALE? :)
More information about the zeromq-dev