[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"

Matt Weinstein matt_weinstein at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 27 13:11:22 CEST 2010

Yes, which layer _are_ we naming, policy or implementation?

I think the STREAM part encapsulates the policy, IN/OUT the specific  
node type.

On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>  
> wrote:
>>> Yeah, this is good. IN = can receive, OUT = can send.
>> Why not be explicit, then... SENDER, RECEIVER?
> And these names still don't say anything at all about the pattern,
> which is load balancing and fair queuing...
> How about FANOUT and FANIN, which combine the notion of in/out with
> the notion of distribution and collecting?
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list