[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"

[Pieter Hintjens]

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Martin Lucina <mato at kotelna.sk> wrote:

>> IN and OUT is unambiguous as opposed to UP and DOWN.
>
> Yeah, this is good. IN = can receive, OUT = can send.

Why not be explicit, then... SENDER, RECEIVER?

Since the role of the nodes, according to the man page is strictly
"can send" or "can receive", this would be the most obvious.

That tutorial, BTW, is on the way but its slower work than I expected.
 I started roping in some contributors but that turned into meta
discussions about who our target audience was and... blah blah blah...
the dog ate my git archive. :-)

On an irrelevant note, Mato, http://api.zeromq.org/ redirects to
www.zeromq.org rather than http://api.zeromq.org/zmq.html, which might
be more useful.

-Pieter