[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"

Martin Lucina mato at kotelna.sk
Tue Jul 27 12:19:48 CEST 2010

sustrik at 250bpm.com said:
> Nicholas Piël wrote:
> > Maybe a better naming would be, instream, outstream
> I like it. It addresses exactly the problem people are having, namely: 
> "What's UP and what's DOWN?"

Indeed, depends on which way up you draw your topology on paper :-)

> IN and OUT is unambiguous as opposed to UP and DOWN.

Yeah, this is good. IN = can receive, OUT = can send. 


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list