[zeromq-dev] PUB/SUB with multiple publishers

Matt Weinstein matt_weinstein at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 17 04:56:40 CEST 2010


Here's a tarball of a working version from my Mac.
Apologies for any coding oversights, it's late.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: zmq_pubsub.tar
Type: application/x-tar
Size: 20480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100716/f831b9c0/attachment.tar>
-------------- next part --------------



BEWARE : stupid Mac resource forks included in the tarball

Please let me know if you have issues..

Best,

Matt

On Jul 16, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Dmitri Toubelis wrote:

> I've abandoned this idea for now, it seems easier to implement my own
> broker, then try to make ZMQ to what it is not designed to do. It  
> would be
> nice to see this feature in a future releases though. It is not a  
> classical
> PUB/SUB pattern but I think it is way more powerful. Can I suggest  
> it as a
> feature request? It should be rather straightforward fix.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
> [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of david  
> starkweather
> Sent: July 16, 2010 8:42 PM
> To: 0MQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] PUB/SUB with multiple publishers
>
> I recently tried something similar.  My aim was to have a main  
> publisher
> socket in the main thread, and then each worker thread have a another
> publisher socket.  I would then have a pipe between the worker sockets
> and a sub socket in the main thread.  It is my understanding that the
> forwarder device is supposed to work for this scenario - i.e. forward
> from the sub skt to the main pub skt.  I recieved no errors, but  
> none of
> the messages got delivered to the other sub skts that subscribed.
>
> I managed to implement my own queue in which I forward all messages,  
> and
> then have one publisher thread to just publish messages.  I have only
> been able to get the pub/sub mechanism to work when there is just one
> publisher.  If anyone has any alternate ideas, I'd be interested.
> thanks.
>
> Grant Starkweather
>
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:34 -0400, Dmitri Toubelis wrote:
>> I have a scenario when I need to use PUB/SUB scheme with multiple
>> publishers. Is it possible to do with "inproc" transport?
>>
>> Here is what I tried:
>> - create PUB socket and bind it to "inproc://pipe" endpoint
>> - create another PUB socket and connect it to the same "inproc:// 
>> pipe"
>> endpoint
>> - create SUB socket for each subscriber and connect them to thre
>> "inproc://pipe" endpoint.
>> - publish message using second publisher.
>>
>> I'm getting no error, but message is not getting delivered to
>> subscribers. Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> Any help is appreciated.
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list